|
Kevin Mannix's Oregon
Hotel chain
Factoid- At
one time not very long ago, Oregon
had the HIGHEST per capita imprisonment rate of any NATION IN THE
WORLD, including Red China.
What do you suppose
might be the cause of that?
A
High crime rate?
|
 |
Kevin Mannix's Legacy
Kevin Mannix is just another old hack Democrat
turned "Republican" (RINO) who has elevated himself by standing on the
bones of the victims of his malicious "Law and Order" career.
Under his "leadership", more and more conduct has been
criminalized to the point that at least one in 30 men
between the ages of 20 and 34 is behind bars (from PEW Report)
Mannix is best known for Oregon
Measure 11, Mandatory Minimum Sentencing. Studies
have shown that Measure 11 has nothing to do with a lower crime rate.
"The point is getting tough on crime has gotten tough on
taxpayers," Adam Gelb, director of the
public safety performance project at the Pew Center.
Nor has it been so hot for the maliciously
prosecuted and INNOCENT accused people in
the unconstitutional administrative law statute "courts" of Oregon.
REPORTS
One
in 100: Behind Bars in America 2008
Feb 28, 2008 - A new report by Pew's Public Safety Performance Project details
how, for the first time in history, more than one in every 100 adults in
America are in jail or prison—a fact that significantly impacts state
budgets without delivering a clear return on public safety.
Read: Summary
View: Full
Report (Adobe PDF)
Here's the PEW story-
Public
Safety Performance
http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/initiatives_detail.aspx?initiativeID=31336
Lots of links and info there.
Chart from above PEW "One in
100" Report
Fiscal
Pressures Lead Some States to Free Inmates Early
By Keith B. Richburg and Ashley Surdin
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, May 5, 2008; A01
NEW YORK -- Reversing decades of tough-on-crime
policies, including mandatory minimum prison sentences for some drug offenders,
many cash-strapped states are embracing a view once dismissed as dangerously
naive: It costs far less to let some felons go free than to keep them locked up.
Prisons lock in chunk of budget
Oregon tops the U.S. in spending the biggest percentage of state funds on
corrections
Friday, February 29, 2008
ASHBEL S. GREEN
The Oregonian Staff
Oregon spends a bigger percentage of its state budget to lock up criminals
and supervise their parole than any other state, according to a new study that
examined three decades of prison growth across America.
And if Oregon voters approve one of two tough-on-crime measures on the
November ballot, that distinction will become more pronounced.
A study by Pew Center on the States found that for the first time in U.S.
history, more than one in 100 adults is in prison or a local jail. The cause:
longer criminal sentences that have seen the nation's prison population nearly
triple since 1987 to 1.6 million inmates.
Oregon has seen a faster growth in prison inmates, from about 4,000 to more
than 13,500.
The main reason in Oregon: Measure 11, the 1994 initiative that set
mandatory minimum sentences for violent crimes. It is responsible for 28
percent of today's prison population.
Gov. Ted Kulongoski said through a spokeswoman that one of the government's
primary responsibilities is to protect its citizens, but prisons should only
be part of the answer.
"The governor doesn't believe that the only way to reduce crime is by
just building more prisons," said Anna Richter Taylor.
The November ballot will give voters a choice in attacking crime and
punishment. Both measures increase penalties for drug dealers, burglars, car
thieves and identity thieves.
An initiative by Republican activist Kevin
Mannix would impose mandatory prison sentences for those crimes and add
4,000 to 6,000 new inmates at a taxpayer cost of $128 million to $200 million
a year.
The Oregon Legislature last week sent an alternative measure to the Nov. 4
ballot that targets repeat offenders. It would add about 1,600 new inmates at
a cost of $50 million a year. The legislative proposal also includes $20
million a year for drug and alcohol treatment and county jails and parole
officers.
The Pew Report says that the prison population across the country grew 1.4
percent in 2007. Oregon saw a 1.1 percent increase. Kentucky's 12 percent
increase was the largest in the country.
The two measures on the November ballot would cause a 12 percent to 44
percent increase in Oregon's prison population.
"Those kinds of numbers would have put Oregon at the top of the heap
in terms of prison growth this year," said Adam Gelb, director of the
public safety performance project at the Pew Center.
And in fact, Gelb said, many states are looking to reduce prison population
growth.
Exhibit A: Texas, which has increased parole and treatment centers and now
projects no growth in its prison population for the next five years.
"They haven't gone soft on crime in Texas. They've gotten smart,"
Gelb said.
Mannix said that Oregon's incarceration rate is below the national average.
But the costs are high because of well-compensated corrections officers, he
said. And you get what you pay for, Mannix argued, saying that state prisons
are among the most drug-free in the country.
Oregon prison officials questioned the Pew numbers, and also pointed out
that the Department of Corrections funnels about 20 percent of its budget
directly to counties for jails and parole.
Gelb said there is no perfect way to compare states.
But in any case, he said, the thrust of the report shows the enormous cost
of long prison sentences. Certainly, he said, violent crime rates have dropped
over the last few decades, and prisons deserve some credit.
Oregon has seen an even greater drop in violent crime than the rest of the
country on average since Measure 11 passed.
But Gelb said that recidivism rates have still remained stubbornly high and
prison budgets take away from other programs.
"The point is getting tough on crime has gotten tough on
taxpayers," he said.
Ashbel S. (Tony) Green: 503-221-8202; tonygreen@news.oregonian.com
http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/1204259110324800.xml&coll=7
*Behind bars in Oregon
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Prison inmates: 13,523 Jail inmates: Roughly 7,400 Prisons: 14 State money
spent in 2007-09 for corrections: $1,263,842,285 Growth estimate if voters
approve Mannix measure: 4,000 to 6,000 more inmates Growth estimate if voters
approve legislative alternative: 1,600 more inmates Source: Oregon Department of
Corrections
*Prison nation
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Prison and jail population: 2.3 million U.S. adult population: 230 million
Who's behind bars? Adult men: 1 in 54 Adult white men: 1 in 106 Adult Latino
men: 1 in 36 Adult African American men: 1 in 15 National corrections spending:
1987: $10.6 billion 2007: $44 billion Percent of state funds spent on
corrections: First: Oregon: 10.9 percent Last: Alabama: 2.6 percent Note: Oregon
was one of four states that spent more on corrections than on higher education.
Source: Pew Center on the States

Partnership For Safety and Justice
www.safetyandjustice.org
503-335-8559 · PO Box 40085 · Portland, OR 97240-0085 · 503-232-1922 (fax)
March 12, 2008
...On one hand we believe the landscape for sentencing reform in Oregon has
been warming over the past few years. On the other hand, we will be
involved in an intense battle in 2008 to defeat a ballot initiative that could
be the worst thing to happen to Oregon's criminal justice system since the
passage of Measure 11's mandatory minimums in 1994.
Kevin Mannix, the author of Measure 11, has collected enough signatures to
put an initiative on the ballot in November 2008 that would create a new set of
mandatory minimum sentences for the property and drug-related offenses.
The state has estimated that if the measure is passed it could grow our prison
population by almost 45% within the first three years alone while costing well
over a billion dollars in new prison construction and operation. This
would be devastating for Oregon. Mannix is banking on simplistic thinking by the
electorate. We thin people would rather invest in prevention strategies
like drug treatment and save taxpayer dollars to invest in schools, healthcare,
and higher education.
The stakes are huge. We are preparing for and unprecedented level of
community outreach and need all the support we can get. We are working to
change a system based primarily on punishment and warehousing more and more
prisoners. We think we can effectively move the state toward policies that
invest in real community safety and strong rehabilitative and transition
programs. Working together we can reduce violence, recidivism and increase
public safety without building more prisons.
...Thank You,
David Rogers
Executive Director
February 26, 2008 - 1:45pm
Summary: Kevin Mannix, author of Measure 11 and
four-time loser in election bids for Governor and Attorney General, has
collected enough signatures to put another crime-related measure on
November’s ballot. Initiative Petition 40 (IP 40), which has not yet been
officially approved or given its final measure number, creates mandatory
minimum sentences for drug and property crimes.
IP 40 would be devastating for Oregon if it passes. It would put upwards
of 6,000 new people in the state prison system in the first three years
alone. The Oregon Criminal Justice Commission estimates that IP 40 would
cost the state between $250 and $400 million a biennium, not including the
cost of new prison construction. The Department of Corrections estimates
this would require up to three new prisons. The human toll and the impact on
the state budget would be dramatic and destructive.
Full Story-
http://safetyandjustice.org/info/or/story/1183
Inside Oregon
http://safetyandjustice.org/info/or

Mannix in the current news
http://search.oregonlive.com/sp?aff=100&keywords=Mannix&x=14&y=7

About this page-
We don't have any "horse in the
race". We are merely anti-Mannix for any public office including dog
catcher.
Oregon Family Rights
http://oregonfamilyrights.com