12-7-2002

Why Doesn’t the State of Oregon Release Melissa Gaston?

Quo Warranto filed into Oregon Supreme Court to release children being abused in foster homes, restore families, account for missing children

~excerpt~

11. We DEMAND- NOW - AN ACCOUNTING OF ALL THE CHILDREN who have been removed in particular in the last ten years since these plans were set in place to profit from the removal of innocent children from parents who committed no crime.

12. We DEMAND that ALL CHILDREN WHO WERE REMOVED AND THERE WAS NO ONE CHARGED WITH A CRIME IN A CIRCUIT COURT, OR THE CHILD WAS NOT CHARGED WITH A CHARGEABLE CRIME, PROSECUTED AND CONVICTED BY A JURY, IS RELEASED IMMEDIATELY TO THEIR FAMILIES. The state of Oregon cannot defend its unlawful process, that these children have been seized without judicial due process of law, and these removals must be reversed.

"ORS418.010 - Children not to be taken charge of when parents object. Nothing in ORS 418.005 shall be construed as authorizing any state official, agent or representative, in carrying out any of the provisions of that section, to take charge of any child over the objection of either of the parents of such child..." 

The People are finished with the fraud that they "volunteer" their parental rights over to the state. The state of Oregon SHALL CEASE all compelled contracts on the People, and stop allowing and joining into compelled contracts by the federal government on the states, enforcing a federal agenda, usurping state rights and Article 10 of the US Constitution.

Read the WHOLE Story

See Pamela and Will Gaston's A Voice for Children website

The daughter ended up in State custody, in multiple seedy, dangerous placements.  We have heard that the daughter destroyed at least one PERFECTLY GOOD foster home with false allegations, which the malicious state blindly prosecuted.  Oregon Family Rights would very much like to hear from those people so we can HELP them too.

The state jerked Taylor around for several months until April 29, 2002 when Taylor found out her daughter had been "misplaced".  The kid had RAN.  The state still does NOT have her in custody.

Taylor contacted Legal Aid on May 17 and was contemplating a "Tort Claim".   On May 20th Oregon CPS was served notice of the Tort Claim.

On May 21, the State showed up at Taylor's house with the police to SEIZE the other 3 children.  Taylor was not at home at the time and hid out from them.

The state immediately launched an all-out attack on her character and remaining children in obvious retaliation.

Based upon the advice of a PROMINENT ATTORNEY, Taylor left the state of Oregon on May 22, 2002, NEVER TO RETURN.  

Taylor had FULL LEGAL AND PHYSICAL CUSTODY of her little children and had EVERY RIGHT to leave the state of Oregon.  She went to Utah, where she immediately went to the Utah CPS to have her kids checked out and herself, since Oregon was alleging Taylor had some kind of "mental problem" and that Taylor was "poisoning the kids".

At a November 2002 hearing, the state of Oregon tried to extend their jurisdiction to Utah by claiming that  (get this)  

a secretary SAYS SHE HEARD a message on an answering machine and CLAIMED that Taylor was only GOING ON VACATION. 

Thereby, Oregon claimed that Taylor was still an Oregon resident and ORDERED her to come to Oregon and SURRENDER her children to Oregon CPS.  The Utah police were at her last known address the NEXT MORNING.

Taylor is now in hiding and is seeking a safe place to be until Oregon calls their dogs off her.  There is MUCH MORE INTRIGUE to the case, and Oregon is a real malfeasant.  Taylor has made more money in a MONTH in her employment in industry than these low IQ mendacious caseworkers with a sick agenda MAKE IN A YEAR.  But they have a CREDENTIAL that makes them "god".

We are working on getting a major Network investigative reporting team to look at her case.  It will make very interesting watching when the Oregon state actors try to cover up their roles in this story.  Just like the Dateline NBC report on Brian and Ruth Christine.  It was FUN watching the state actors squirm and sweat when their dirty work was being exposed on NATIONAL TV!

Fite Family Charges D.A. and Judge with Corruption and Abuse
Written by
Oregon Observer staff

On June l5, 2002, 200 angry citizens from around Oregon gathered at the Senior Center in Baker City, Oregon as a show of support for the Fite family and their on-going battle against the outrageous and high-handed attempt of the Oregon State Offices for Services to Family and Children (SOSCF) in trying to take Kenny and Misty Fite’s 2 year old son Wacey Lane Fite. Also attending the hearing was Roger Weidner, former Oregon Gubernatorial candidate. 

Mother gets life for girl's killing
07/16/02
MICHELLE ROBERTS

A Gresham woman will spend at least 25 years in prison for strangling her 20-month-old daughter during a state-supervised visit last year.

Sharon Yvonne Weston, 33, pleaded no contest Monday to one count of murder, sparing herself a possible death sentence.

Weston, shifting uncomfortably in leg chains and jail shower sandals, apologized to her daughter's foster parents and the State Office for Services to Children and Families' human services aide who supervised the visit during which she killed her daughter, Alexis Mariah Lopez.

"I hope this won't torment you for the rest of your lives," Weston said. "Even when I get out of prison. I'm always going to be in prison in my heart."

Dale A. Kraft, who did not attend Monday's hearing, allowed Weston and her daughter to stroll out of his sight at Gresham's Main City Park during a visit July 11, 2001.

Weston took the toddler to a remote area and strangled her with a cord from her jacket. She took the body to a nearby funeral home, where employees called police.

Officers found Kraft reading a newspaper in a state-owned car more than 45 minutes later. He was fired a month after the killing. Prosecutors considered charging him with a crime but determined that his agency's inconsistent policies and poor communication left Kraft unaware Weston posed a danger to her child.

In exchange for her plea, the judge dismissed two counts of aggravated murder and one count of attempted aggravated murder.

Multnomah County Circuit Judge Jean Kerr Maurer sentenced Weston to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 25 years.

"I suppose this community will always reel from what you did," Maurer told Weston. "I'm sure the person who was supervising the visit will never overcome this . . . Fingers can be pointed, but in the end, the conduct was yours."

Feared losing custody Weston told detectives she had decided to kill her daughter after a court hearing a few days earlier that left her certain that her parental rights would be terminated. Weston told police she was afraid Alexis' father, Fernando Lopez-Perez, would get custody and sexually abuse Alexis as Weston's father had abused her. Lopez-Perez did not have custody of his daughter but police said there was no evidence that he had ever sexually abused her.

The State Office for Services to Children and Families took custody of Alexis in October 2000 after Weston threatened to kill or injure herself and the girl. In the past several years, Weston had lost custody of two other children, a 14-year-old girl and a 9-year-old boy.

In a long courtroom monologue, Marc Sussman, one of Weston's two lawyers, discussed her background, saying it "doesn't excuse or explain, but makes it more understandable."

State workers place sex offender with young girls
The Associated Press
7/11/02 11:03 AM

PRINEVILLE, Ore. (AP) -- State welfare workers placed a 13-year-old boy convicted of sexual harassment in a family with two young girls, both of whom he later sexually abused, according to court records. 

The case has pitted both the boy's family and his foster family against each other and raised questions about the judgment of state workers in allowing the placement. 

The boy had previously sexually abused his 7-year-old sister in 1999, while he was staying with his grandmother, according to court and police records. 

Court records reviewed by The Bulletin show he was charged with two counts of sex abuse and admitted to a reduced charge of sexual harassment in May 2000. An admission is similar to a guilty plea by an adult.

search on antidepressant in pregnancy

Now the state won't give her back her baby because she is "depressed"!

KATU2 Portland, Oregon
December 10, 2002
DHS gets another poor review  DON'T MISS THE MOVIE!

SALEM - Parents are paying more attention to the Department of Human Services and the care it takes with individual cases.

These parents who are used to getting the run around from DHS are now receiving attention because of a recent report.

It's hard to imagine what childbirth must be like unless you are a mother. It must be equally difficult to picture how painful it would be having that child torn away from you within hours of its birth, unless you experienced it.

That is the nightmare that Amber Tawney lives with. She is allowed a two-hour meeting once a week with her six-week-old boy.

"The only thing I want right now is my baby," she said.

It takes hours of waiting, phone calling and red tape and sometimes the meeting never occurs.

"They (DHS) tell you to do one thing, so you go do it, then they want something else, then something else… You call and leave messages, which you don't always hear back," said Tawney.

Tawney said the reason they took the newborn was that she refused to take anti-depressants during her pregnancy.

She said she didn't take them because she didn't want to the drugs to deform her child.

Caseworkers have cited a previous suicide attempt and a possible recent depression as reasons for not getting her child back.

This is the STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE.  Were it not for the news picking up the story, this baby would have gone for adoption no matter what the mother did.  The mother committed NO CRIME, and she will not be charged with any crime.  The state doesn't bother with any semblance of DUE PROCESS.  Tawney is a good, conscientious mother for NOT TAKING DRUGS, and she is being crucified for it.  There is NOTHING  that compares to having your child snatched by CPS for CAUSING SITUATIONAL DEPRESSION. 

~Oregon Family Rights and A Voice for Children~

 are hereby recommending:

TO: All parents who have children seized by the state of Oregon and who have NOT BEEN CRIMINALLY CHARGED.

1- Prepare your SWORN AFFIDAVIT stating YOUR VERSION OF HISTORY.

2- RESCIND any and all signatures obtained from you by threats or failure to inform you of the consequences of your signature

3- If you have already signed your kids away under deception, use the REVOCATION OF AFFIDAVIT OF RELINQUISHMENT OF PARENTAL RIGHTS

4- Print out "ORS418.010 - Children not to be taken charge of when parents object. Nothing in ORS 418.005 shall be construed as authorizing any state official, agent or representative, in carrying out any of the provisions of that section, to take charge of any child over the objection of either of the parents of such child..." 

5- Print out-

And point out that your kids ARE being detained to compel you to sign contracts for "services" you don't want and take "classes" as an "explicit or implicit condition for the release of the person detained".

6- Print out http://www.familyrightsassociation.com/bin/CPS_violates_these_every_case.htm

Point out that the CPS HAS CONSPIRED AGAINST YOUR RIGHTS, which is a Capital Crime

7- File this paperwork with the courts, the CPS, the DA, the police dept, and anybody else you can think of- 

and DEMAND YOUR KIDS BACK NOW

If everybody did this enmass, we would break the back of this Organized Crime Syndicate in a week.

Here's what's coming next.   Absolutely Voluntary.   Of course it is. Just like their other "services".

From Dictionary.com-     Officious

of·fi·cious    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (-fshs) adj. Marked by excessive eagerness in offering unwanted services or advice to others: an officious host; officious attention.